Posts tagged Ubuntu
Building an HD Media Center – For Less Than £200!!!
7[ad code=1 align=center]
With digital media beginning to take hold in the home, it’s important to consider the best ways to access that media. Many people now have dedicated media PC’s, either connected to a traditional monitor or to a big screen TV. The problem has always been that it’s inconvenient to have an ugly grey box sat in amongst your other home entertainment devices. As well as this, “normal” PC’s are loud, power hungry and take up an awful lot of space, hardly useful features when the main aim of the device is to let you access your media in your living room.
The solution is to create a PC that is small, quiet, draws as little power as possible and is yet affordable and can access all of your home media and display it on your TV or monitor. With a bit of careful planning this is entirely possible and in this walkthrough I’ll be demonstrating how you can achieve it for less than £200.
Hardware
There are some important choices to make when it comes to the hardware you need. You could go all out and spend hundreds of pounds on powerful processors and graphics cards, but for media playback only this isn’t required, you only need to spend that much money if you’re looking at using your PC for gaming, and that isn’t what we’re interested in here.
Motherboard
By far the best choice of motherboard at the moment is a board which features the Intel Atom line of processors and, if you want to playback HD quality video, the Nvidia Ion graphics chip. You can pick these boards up for around £120, or even less if you don’t need HD playback. Most of these boards will be in a form factor known as Mini-ITX which means that the entire motherboard will be 17cm x 17cm or less. This is a lot smaller than a traditional motherboards, which allows us to fit our components into a much smaller case.
Atom processors also draw a lot less power than traditional desktop processors, in fact an Intel Atom/Nvidia Ion motherboard shouldn’t draw any more than 30W of power. A lot of them also have a simple heatsink cooling the processor which means there are no noisy fans in your machine getting in the way of your music or videos.
Most of these motherboards come with connections aimed solely at home media use, the one I’m using has an HDMI port as well as optical and coaxial audio outputs so it could easily be connected to a surround sound speaker set up for high definition 5.1 audio.
Memory
Most Atom/Ion motherboards will use DDR2 memory, which is relatively cheap. You would be able to get by with 1GB, but for the minimal additional cost it’s worth shelling out for 2GB. It’s important to realise that the Nvidia Ion chip will also use this memory, up to 256MB of it, so 1GB would leave you with only 768MB for your operating system and applications to use.
Case
There are a growing number of bespoke Mini-ITX sized cases which make maximum use of the size of the motherboard to create a small, discrete solution which wouldn’t look out of place in the living room. It’s important to check if your chosen case comes with a power supply (most do) as it can be almost impossible to find a compatible power supply if they don’t.
When choosing your case you’ll need to consider which hard disks and optical drives you’ve chosen, as you’ll need to make sure that it has enough space to house all of your components. Places like www.ebuyer.com and www.mini-itx.com are good places to shop for cases, just remember that this PC is going to sit alongside your TV so make sure that you choose based upon aesthetics as well as compatibility.
Hard Disk
If you really want to create a silent, low power PC then the only thing to do is buy a Solid State Disk (SSD). These have no moving parts so are completely silent and draw a lot less power than a traditional hard disk. The only problem with them is the cost; they are ridiculously expensive when compared to traditional drives; a 32GB one has set me back £50 in this case. A traditional hard disk of the same price would carry probably 750GB of data.
What this means is that if you plan to store your data on this PC then you’re going to have to live with the additional power requirements and noise. But if you have all of your videos and music stored elsewhere (on another computer or on a network drive for instance) then 32GB is plenty for the operating system and programs so it may well be the best option.
Optical Drives
If you’re building a media PC then the chances are that you already have all your media saved on a hard disk somewhere, in which case you may not need an optical drive at all. In the software section I’ll show how you can install all of the software you need using a USB pen drive. If, however, you feel that you may need to read or write optical disks then you can pick up “laptop” style drives quite cheaply from the same stockists mentioned above.
Most cases will allow you to mount a slimline optical drive so it’s not necessarily a problem if you want one, but it will add to the cost, size and power requirements of your PC so give some thought as to whether or not you actually need one.
In the PC I’m building I have no need for an optical drive as all my media is stored on a networked hard disk, so I haven’t included one.
Assembly
Once you’ve purchased all of your hardware it shouldn’t be too difficult to assemble it (if you’ve built a PC before). In essence, the same standards and form factors are employed for Mini-ITX based systems as normal ones, things are just a little smaller. In the video below I’ve demonstrated the assembly of the parts into a working PC, ready to have it’s software installed.
At this point we have a fully assembled PC which meets the criteria we set out at the beginning: It’s small, draws a relatively small amount of power and it cost less than £200. The next step is to install software on this machine that will allow us to playback our media libraries as well as access online media from the likes of Youtube, BBC iPlayer and other online TV and radio services.
Review: Boxee Media Center
4A friend, knowing that I use XBMC at home, recently suggested I try Boxee. At first I was reluctant, after all; all of my libraries are set up with XBMC and working perfectly fine, what else could Boxee offer me that XBMC doesn’t? The answer is: quite a lot.
I’ll start off by stating that Boxee is actually developed from XBMC, and uses the XBMC code to run. There are a few advantages to this:
- It’s just as cheap (free!) as XBMC
- It’ll play any files that XBMC can play
- It has a large user community and strong development
- It’ll run on far more platforms than some other media centers; Windows, Linux, Mac, AppleTV, all no problem.
These facts are where the similarities end, however. Boxee has been designed from the ground up with online content and social networking at it’s heart. As well as playing back any of your own media files, it can also pull down content from the internet from a variety of sources. This is nothing that XBMC can’t achieve with a bit of tweaking, but the point of Boxee is that you don’t have to tweak it, it’s all there and ready to use right out of the box.

One big advantage that Boxee has over XBMC (in the UK at least) is the inclusion of BBC iPlayer, which allows you to watch most BBC broadcasts up to 7 days after they were first aired. This is a feature that was removed from XBMC at the beginning of 2010, but Boxee has been able to retain it by utilising your computers own web browser and accessing iPlayer directly.

In addition to iPlayer, there are countless other apps available for Boxee, popular ones include Youtube, Google Videos, Facebook picture viewer and Flickr, which will all allow you to view online content quickly and easily and from the comfort of your living room using nothing but a remote control or the Boxee iPhone application.
Boxee also allows you to connect your Boxee login with a number of social networking sites such as Facebook in order to view what your friends are watching and what they’ve recommended for you, this is a nice feature, but I was unable to find anyone on my Facebook friends list who uses Boxee. Whether this is a bug in the software or testament to how many of my friends use Boxee remains to be seen, but for those who find it working it is a nice feature.
Where Boxee lags behind XBMC (in some people’s eyes) is the inability to change the look and feel to the same degree that you can on XBMC. There are no additional themes available (so far as I can see), although users are able to specify an image (or images) to use as the wallpaper for the home screen.
That being said, the Boxee theme is perfectly usable. It’s clean and responsive and offers a clear window into your media libraries. The controls are optimized for remote controls, but a keyboard or mouse can also be used if you so choose, in fact a keyboard may prove useful when browsing for online content on YouTube or Google Videos.
The library management is very similar to that of XBMC, though the online database feature seems to be locked down to IMDB only (whereas on XBMC you can choose your database manually). This is fine, though some TV show information was still missing after Boxee had completed it’s initial scan. Adding or changing information is a little easier than on XBMC, the Boxee guys have given a shortcut for doing so on the interface so that you can quickly and easily change the information for your media.

Conclusions:
All in all, Boxee offers a well rounded alternative to XBMC for those who wish to have easier access to online media, whilst retaining the same level of information for their home libraries. The inclusion of the social networking aspect is a nice thought, though how impactful this is in the long run remains to be seen. Like XBMC, it has no PVR functionality, so is no use for those wishing to record TV broadcasts on their computer, but it remains at the forefront of media management and playback, and for that we give it top marks.
Pro’s:
- Rock Solid XBMC Foundation
- Free
- Online media aspect
- Works on all major PC platforms
Con’s:
- Little personalization possible
- Some media information missing from IMDB
- No PVR Functionality
Rating: 10/10
The Debate:- Windows vs. Mac vs. Linux
5This is a question that I get asked often; which system is better: Windows, Mac or Linux. The problem is it’s not as simple as that, each system has it’s own inherent strengths and weaknesses. Depending on what you want to do with your computer depends on what system is best for you. Perhaps the best way to evaluate this is to look at each system independantly; its stengths, its weaknesses and what exactly you get for your money.
Windows
The most popular Operating System in the world, used by around 90% of computers globally in one form or another. Windows latest incarnation, dubbed “Windows 7″, came out last year to an improved reception from users compared to the previous version, Windows Vista.
Windows 7 has a number of improvements on previous versions, it’s designed to be more user friendly from the ground up, its performance is greatly improved compared to Vista and any Vista programs are guaranteed to run properly (according to Microsoft). There’s also a degree of compatibility with Windows XP programs as well; even if the program won’t run correctly under Windows 7, there’s a compatibility wizard that will (hopefully) allow your Windows XP programs to run.
Advantages
- The most popular operating system by far
- Widespread software support
- The best platform for games
- Regular security updates
Disadvantages
- Expensive (unless bundled with a new PC)
- Most at risk from viruses
- Little bundled software
Mac OS X
OS X is the name of the operating system on Apple Macintosh computers, the current version being 10.6 (dubbed Snow Leopard).
Mac’s are slightly different from other computers in that you can’t buy OS X and install it on any computer, you have to buy an Apple Mac to run OS X. If you can overlook this flaw (and it is quite a big one) then the Mac system has some great features. None of the other systems can compare with the Macs ability to manage media (photos, music, movies) right out of the box. Photo and video editing is a breeze on a Mac, whats more the basic software for doing so (called the iLife suite) is bundled with every new Mac.
Support for Macs is growing as a result of Apples success in other markets with the iPod and iPhone, more companies are developing software for the Mac platform all the time, and just recently the gaming industry has shown a slight shift toward the Mac platform with the release of the “Steam” program for Mac.
Advantages
- Great for managing your media
- Little threat from viruses
- Increased software support from developers
- Microsoft Office available for Mac
Disadvantages
- Expensive – you have to have a Mac to run it
- Not as much software available as for Windows
- Still some compatibility issues with Windows
Linux
Linux is coming along in leaps and bounds at the moment, there are many variants available depending on what you want to do, but the most popular at the moment is the Ubuntu project. Ubuntu’s latest release goes a long way to addressing some of the problems of earlier releases. It’s now easier to install software from the ever increasing catalogue of free applications, some of which have features to rival some of the expensive Windows alternatives. It’s also less likely to be infected by viruses or malware due to the way it’s written.
Linux will also run on a Mac, or any reasonably modern PC.
Advantages
- Free – can be downloaded direct from the web
- An ever expanding catalogue of free software
- not susceptible to virus attacks
- continues to evolve – new releases every six months
Disadvantages
- Very little commercial support from software developers
- A bit of a change from Windows
- Almost no decent games available
Conclusions
There is no clear winner in all this, each system has its own advantages and disadvantages, and its own place in the market as well. If photo and video editing is your thing (and you have the money) then Mac is probably the way to go. If games are your thing, then it has to be Microsoft Windows. If, however, you’re on a budget and open to trying new things, Linux might be the way to go.
None of these systems will ever overpower and destroy the competitors, in fact as time goes on it seems likely that the market share of these systems will approach equilibrium. It is up to the individual to decide what system is right for them, long time users of any platform may try one of the competitors and find it suits their needs better. Or, they may find that their loyalty was deserved all along. If you don’t try, you’ll never find out…
Buying A New PC – For Under £200!
3There’s no denying that the cost of PC’s has come down dramatically over the last decade. I still have memories from back in 1994, stood in PC World with my parents and sister, as my parents parted with a huge amount of money for what was at the time a state of the art system.
These days buying a PC is a much cheaper commitment, there are more manufacturers than I can count, and increased production of components in the far east means that the cost of materials is a lot less than it was in 1994. A lot less!
If you only need a PC for web browsing, media playback or light office work, then I would seriously recommend a PC based on the Intel Atom processor. These machines are not designed to be ultra fast, but unless you are planning on playing games or photo/video editing then they will be entirely adequate for your needs. Not only are PC’s based on this processor generally quite cheap, they are also usually a lot smaller than a normal PC, and draw a fraction of the power of a full system. In the modern home, these last two points are becoming more and more important.
Of the Intel Atom based PC’s available, by far the most attractive for me is the Acer Aspire Revo (picture below). This PC not only has the Intel Atom processor mentioned above, but also the Nvidia Ion graphics processor, a combination which allows this small and low power PC to playback full HD video and even undertake some light gaming, should that interest you. The Acer Aspire Revo is currently available in a few different configurations, with different amounts of memory and different sized hard disks, the cheapest of which is currently available on eBuyer.com for less than £180 (correct as I write this).

For that money you get the PC, with a keyboard and mouse, and a genuine copy of Windows Vista Home Premium. Previously, you would have been able to buy this PC even cheaper (less than £150) with no operating system, but it looks like eBuyer have stopped selling that model. One thing to note about the Acer Aspire Revo product line; none of them have an optical (DVD) drive. This in itself is not the end of the world, more and more people are now using download services for their software and media needs, and if you do feel you need one, you can purchase a USB DVD drive for less than £50.
It’s worth noting that while this PC does come with Microsoft Windows Vista, it will likely perform better with Ubuntu Linux (reviewed here) installed instead. Ubuntu will offer (in my opinion) a better home and office experience than the included Windows Vista software, and the beauty of Ubuntu is that you can run it alongside Windows Vista, so no need to delete Windows.
It’s obvious to anyone looking for a new PC online that prices are more competitive now than they have ever been, and while the example above may not meet your needs, a “proper” PC shouldn’t cost you more than £300-400. For that amount of money you can afford a decent PC for home use, able to handle any tasks that a home or small business user will require. The only time you should need to spend more money than this on a new PC is when you have gaming or professional media editing in mind, but that is a different ball game all together, people literally spend thousands on their “rigs” in order to keep up with the latest hardware and software developments. Don’t be fooled, unless you want to play games or be James Cameron, you do not need to be one of them.
EDIT:– For a guide on how much money you should spend on a PC, check out this article
Ubuntu 10.04 LTS – Quick Review
2So this evening I got round to installing Ubuntu 10.04 on my trusty Pentium 4 test machine. I must say that so far, overall, I am impressed with the changes that have been made both in terms of the revamped user interface and with the extra features evident right from the get go. This isn’t a full review, just some first impressions and bullet points on changes that I feel are important. I’m not going to go to the lengths of adding screen shots because I have the feeling that the Blogosphere is going to be buzzing with them by the end of the weekend, what’s important here is how this release differs from previous Ubuntu releases and whether or not Linux is finally ready for a place within the home.
The Installation Process
Not alot to say here, the Ubuntu installation process has remained largely unchanged since version 8.04. What’s evident to any Linux faithful immediately is the new default theme, which has an all round more welcoming look and feels right straight away. There are selection screens for location, language, partition editing and user accounts, and then we’re off!
First Impressions
Right off the bat I can confirm that the developers claims that Ubuntu loads faster than all previous versions is true. I estimate the total boot time from turning on the machine to reaching the desktop to be around 20 seconds. On a machine that’s 5 years old that is impressive. All hardware was detected on bootup and within seconds I was connected to my wireless network and surfing with the included Firefox browser.
The first thing I wanted to check out was the integrated social networking features built into the taskbar, however I couldn’t because within a few seconds the OS had recognised the Nvidia 6200 graphics card and asked me if I wanted to install the proprietary Nvidia drivers. This is actually a welcome interruption; this is the first Ubuntu release that featured built-in support for Nvidia GPU’s. previously the user had to manually download the drivers and install them. Two or three clicks later and the machine is rebooting with the new Nvidia drivers installed. Back to the social networking…
The new “Me Menu” is a drop down list located at the top right of the screen, clicking it brings up a rather baron looking pane with options to manage chat accounts and broadcast accounts, the former being IM accounts like Windows Live Messenger and GoogleTalk, the latter being social networking sites like Flickr, Myspace, Twitter and Facebook. Provide your account details for any of the available networks and the program springs into life, bringing up any incoming messages or broadcasts and allowing you to view them right from the desktop. This is a feature that I have a lot of time for, not least because I’m a member of a fair few IM networks and social networking sites, and this brings them all together in once place, eliminating the need to have two or three tabs open in my web browser.
The next major improvement in this release is the newly designed software centre. This is a feature that has come on leaps and bounds in the last few releases and 10.04 continues this trend. Software is now categorised better and navigation has been improved greatly from the old system. I was able to quickly find and install a few choice favourites with no issues whatsoever. This will be welcome to both Linux converts and the party faithful, being able to find the software that suits your needs quickly and easily is something that will go down well across the board.
Another new feature that Ubuntu is pushing with this release is the Ubuntu One cloud computing system. Basically you get 2GB of free online storage, which can be navigated to right from the desktop of file manager, great for important documents that you want to backup, or large files that you want to share with other users. While I was using it the web interface timed out a few times but I’m comfortable in putting that down to the feature being tried out by just about every Linux user on the planet about now. This is effectively an Open Source version of Apple’s MobileMe concept within OSx and is a welcome addition to the overall package.
Last of all is the Ubuntu One Music Store, which is the first real integrated media store within Linux. To date the catalogue is not great, in no way can it compete with some of the larger stores such as iTunes, but it’s a good start and I can see it developing into something worth using. It has the added advantage that all the downloads are DRM free, so will work on pretty much any MP3 player out there.
Conclusions.
All in all this is an excellent progression for the Ubuntu project, it’s taken stock of some of the emerging markets such as social networking and cloud computing and flawlessly integrated them into what was already becoming a decent and usable product. I would not be surprised to see more and more netbooks and “second machines” in the home switching over to Ubuntu as a result of this release. Whilst it’s true that many users will need to stick close to Windows to meet all of their requirements, Ubuntu has taken huge steps forward in terms of usability and reached a point where it’s doing a better job than Windows in some aspects. At the end of the day, this is a full featured operating system, with features that people want, for the grand price of…….Nothing! At that price, it might be time to consider making the switch.
Happy Ubuntu Day!
2With the new Ubuntu release looming, I’ll be investigating some of the new features and evaluating their performance, stay tuned for a review of Ubuntu’s new features including:- The all new bundled Nvidia drivers, integrated social networking, new boot experience and improved file sharing!
Check back from time to time for reviews and guides of the new features in Ubuntu 10.04.
